| |
15-20 |
10-14 |
5-9 |
0-4 |
| Clear Hypothesis |
Concept clearly explained in presentation. Concept relevant in terms of practical application. Hypothesis clearly reflects a need. |
Concept explained in presentation. Concept of practical application. Hypothesis reflects a need. |
Concept explained in presentation. Concept not very practical application. Hypothesis somewhat reflects a need. |
Concept is not explained in presentation. Concept irrelevant in terms of practical application. Hypothesis does not reflect a need. |
| Scientific process (Data/Results/Analysis) |
Authentic collection of experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results. Mention of errors. Detailed analysis of results. |
A collection of experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results briefly. Some mention of errors. An analysis of results. |
Some experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results. Brief analysis of results. |
Some experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results.. No analysis of results. |
| Content/Details |
Well-researched information, cited clearly. Information relevant and comprehensive. |
Researched information, cited fairly clearly. Information relevant and |
Researched information, cited. Information relevant. |
Not well-researched information, not cited clearly. Information irrelevant |
| Difficulty/Originality |
Futuristic applications defined. Information interesting and above grade level. Concept original and current. Concept enriching for the grade level scientist.. |
Information interesting and at grade level. Concept current. Concept somewhat enriching for the grade level scientist. |
Information at grade level.. Concept relevant for the grade level scientist. |
Information below grade level. Concept irrelevant for the grade level scientist. |
| Presentation/Interview |
High level of Confidence in responding. General knowledge related to the project clarity of the thought process Attractive, eye-catching Poster design. Detailed write-up in log book. |
A little more or less than 5 minutes. Quite clearly explain concept, some clarity in thought process, research and significance of project. Clear explanation of the scientific process. |
Much more or less than 5 minutes. Not clearly explain concept, unclear thought process, some thought towards thought process, research and significance of project. Attempts explanation of the scientific process |
Not prepared to present. Confused explanation of concept, confused thought process, research and significance of project. Cannot explain the scientific process |
